Nucpaedia
Nucpaedia

PET/CT in Osteosarcoma

1. What it is

  • A malignant bone tumour whose cells make osteoid (immature bone); the commonest primary malignant bone tumour.
  • Two age peaks: adolescents during the growth spurt, and older adults, in whom secondary osteosarcoma follows Paget's disease or radiotherapy.
  • Risk factors: Li–Fraumeni syndrome (TP53), hereditary retinoblastoma (RB1), Paget's disease, previous radiotherapy.
TypeKey point
Conventional (high grade): osteoblastic, chondroblastic, fibroblasticMost cases; intensely FDG avid
TelangiectaticBlood-filled spaces with fluid levels; mimics an aneurysmal bone cyst
Surface: parosteal and periostealParosteal: low grade, back of the distal femur, low uptake. Periosteal: intermediate grade, tibial or femoral shaft
SecondaryOlder adults, after Paget's disease or radiotherapy; poor prognosis

2. Where it arises

Osteosarcoma arises in the metaphysis of long bones, most often around the knee.
Figure 1. Osteosarcoma arises in the metaphysis of long bones, most often around the knee.

3. How the tumour looks on CT

FeatureWhat CT shows
SiteMetaphysis of a long bone, often around the knee
BoneMixed lytic and sclerotic destruction with a wide zone of transition
MatrixCloud-like osteoid mineralisation in the bone and the soft-tissue mass: the key CT sign
Cortex and periosteumCortical breakthrough; sunburst (spiculated) periosteal reaction; Codman triangle
Soft tissueMass, often partly mineralised
VariantsTelangiectatic: lytic with fluid–fluid levels and little matrix. Parosteal: dense lobulated mass stuck to the back of the distal femur with a thin lucent cleft
LungsMetastases may calcify or ossify, and can cause pneumothorax

MRI shows the extent in the marrow, skip lesions in the same bone, and the relationship to the joint, vessels and nerves.

4. Work-up and pattern of spread

Work-up of osteosarcoma (left) and its pattern of spread (right). About 15–20% have lung metastases at diagnosis.
Figure 2. Work-up of osteosarcoma (left) and its pattern of spread (right). About 15–20% have lung metastases at diagnosis.

5. Staging (AJCC 8th edition, appendicular skeleton)

CategoryDefinition
T1 / T28 cm or less / more than 8 cm
T3Discontinuous tumours (skip lesions) in the primary bone
N1Regional lymph nodes
M1a / M1bLung / bone or other distant sites
  • Stage groups: IA T1 low grade; IB T2–T3 low grade; IIA T1 high grade; IIB T2 high grade; III T3 high grade; IVA M1a; IVB N1 or M1b.
  • Surgeons also use Enneking (MSTS): I low grade, II high grade, III metastatic; A within, B outside the compartment.

6. Indications for PET/CT

SituationRole
StagingFDG PET/CT, bone scan or whole-body MRI for bone metastases and skip lesions, as clinically indicated. In a paediatric study PET detected nodal (95% vs 25%) and bone (90% vs 57%) metastases better than conventional imaging
Lung nodulesChest CT decides: PET found only 25% of lung metastases that CT found
Biopsy targetThe hottest solid part of the tumour
Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapyPrognostic; does not replace histology
Suspected recurrenceWhen MRI is degraded by a prosthesis; whole-body restaging before salvage
Routine follow-upNot indicated

Other tracers: ⁹⁹ᵐTc-MDP bone scan for skeletal staging; ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI is investigational.

7. Response to chemotherapy

Metabolic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (schematic example). Good response: SUVmax after chemotherapy below 2.5, or SUVmax after / SUVmax before 0.5 or less.
Figure 3. Metabolic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (schematic example). Good response: SUVmax after chemotherapy below 2.5, or SUVmax after / SUVmax before 0.5 or less.
  • Outcome: 4-year progression-free survival was 73% with SUVmax after chemotherapy below 2.5, against 39% above it (40 patients).
  • Histology stays the reference: 90% or more tumour necrosis is a good response; PET agreed with histology in only 58–68%.
  • No validated action yet: in EURAMOS-1, adding ifosfamide and etoposide for poor histological responders did not improve event-free survival.

8. Patient preparation and reporting

  • Preparation: scan from vertex to toes including the whole affected limb; inject in the opposite arm; scan before biopsy if possible; keep the patient warm; use the same scanner and uptake time for response scans; record chemotherapy, biopsy, surgery, G-CSF and any prosthesis.
  • Report: the hottest solid part and its SUVmax, the soft-tissue mass, skip lesions, lungs on CT, bone metastases, nodes (rare), the stage, and for response the SUVmax before and after chemotherapy and their ratio.

9. Pitfalls

PitfallWhy it misleads
Physes in adolescentsSymmetrical bands of uptake
Giant cell tumour, chondroblastoma, aneurysmal bone cyst, Langerhans cell histiocytosisBenign but can be hot (giant cell tumours averaged SUV 4.6)
Healing fracture, biopsy track, postoperative changeInflammation
G-CSFDiffuse marrow uptake
Small lung nodulesFDG-negative but may be metastases

10. When to do PET/CT: what the guidelines say

Time pointRecommendationGuideline
StagingChest CT plus bone scan and/or whole-body MRI and/or FDG PET/CT, as clinically indicatedESMO–EURACAN–GENTURIS–ERN PaedCan 2021
ResponseNo PET recommendation; histological necrosis is the referenceESMO 2021
Follow-upClinical review, imaging of the primary site and chest imaging; no routine PETESMO 2021

Test yourself

2 quick questions. Pick an answer to see the explanation.

1. A 17-year-old with distal femoral osteosarcoma has SUVmax 8.4 before and 2.1 after neoadjuvant MAP chemotherapy. The resected specimen shows 70% necrosis. How should these be reconciled?
2. Staging PET/CT for an osteosarcoma shows three 4-mm lung nodules without FDG uptake. What is the correct interpretation?
References
  1. Strauss SJ, Frezza AM, Abecassis N, et al. Bone sarcomas: ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS-ERN PaedCan Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(12):1520-36.
  2. Tanaka K, Ozaki T. New TNM classification (AJCC eighth edition) of bone and soft tissue sarcomas: JCOG Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Study Group. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019;49(2):103-7.
  3. Völker T, Denecke T, Steffen I, et al. Positron emission tomography for staging of pediatric sarcoma patients: results of a prospective multicenter trial. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(34):5435-41.
  4. Hawkins DS, Conrad EU, Butrynski JE, et al. [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography response is associated with outcome for extremity osteosarcoma in children and young adults. Cancer. 2009;115(15):3519-25.
  5. Marina NM, Smeland S, Bielack SS, et al. Comparison of MAPIE versus MAP in patients with a poor response to preoperative chemotherapy for newly diagnosed high-grade osteosarcoma (EURAMOS-1): an open-label, international, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(10):1396-408.
  6. Aoki J, Watanabe H, Shinozaki T, et al. FDG PET of primary benign and malignant bone tumors: standardized uptake value in 52 lesions. Radiology. 2001;219(3):774-7.
  7. Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJG, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(2):328-54.

Spotted an error or something out of date? Report an error