Nucpaedia
Nucpaedia
Paediatric · Neuroblastoma

Neuroblastoma Imaging (MIBG)

Snapshot

¹²³I-MIBG is central to neuroblastoma: it stages disease, quantifies skeletal and soft-tissue burden with semi-quantitative scores (e.g. SIOPEN/Curie), assesses response, and identifies candidates for ¹³¹I-MIBG therapy — a paediatric theranostic. FDG PET is the standard alternative for MIBG-non-avid tumours (revised INRC 2017); ¹⁸F-DOPA and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-peptide PET are complementary options.

Read the full article →In-depth, fully referenced version

Neuroblastoma arises from neural-crest tissue and usually takes up MIBG, making it both a staging tool and a treatment target. Standardised scoring allows objective response assessment.

StagingMIBG whole-body
ScoringSIOPEN/Curie
Theranostic¹³¹I-MIBG therapy
Simulated anterior and posterior MIBG images of a child with a left adrenal neuroblastoma and bone metastases in the skull, spine, pelvis, right humerus, both femurs and left tibia, beside worksheets scoring the same scan as SIOPEN 9 and Curie 10.
Figure. Simulated ¹²³I-MIBG scan of stage 4 neuroblastoma scored segment by segment: SIOPEN counts skeletal lesions in 12 segments (0–6 each, maximum 72) and Curie scores 9 skeletal segments plus soft tissue (0–3 each, maximum 30). Scoring the same way on every scan makes response assessment objective (after Lewington et al., Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017, and Ady et al., Eur J Cancer 1995).

When to image

  • Staging at diagnosis and assessing treatment response.
  • Detecting relapse.
  • Selecting patients for ¹³¹I-MIBG therapy.

How to read it

  • Score skeletal and soft-tissue uptake with a validated system for objective comparison.
  • Correlate with anatomical imaging and marrow studies.
  • MIBG-non-avid disease → assess with FDG PET (INRC 2017); ¹⁸F-DOPA or ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-peptide PET as complementary options.

Protocol

  • Thyroid blockade; review interfering medications.
  • ¹²³I-MIBG whole-body planar/SPECT(-CT) at ~24 h; weight-based dosing (5.2 MBq/kg, minimum 37 MBq, maximum 370–400 MBq).
  • Consistent technique for serial scoring.

Pitfalls

  • Some neuroblastomas do not take up MIBG.
  • Drug interference and physiological uptake.
  • Scoring requires standardisation for valid comparison.
Evidence & guidelines
  • EANM neuroblastoma imaging guideline (Bar-Sever et al., Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;45:2009–2024); SIOPEN scoring (Lewington et al., 2017); revised INRC (Park et al., J Clin Oncol 2017;35:2580–2587).
  • MIBG avidity selects ¹³¹I-MIBG therapy candidates.
In depth
  • ~90% of neuroblastomas are MIBG-avid, so ¹²³I-MIBG whole-body (± SPECT/CT) is the cornerstone; ~10% are non-avid.
  • Curie score: 9 skeletal segments plus 1 soft-tissue region, each scored 0–3 (maximum 30); SIOPEN score: 12 skeletal segments, each scored 0–6 (maximum 72).
  • After induction chemotherapy, a Curie score ≤2 or a SIOPEN skeletal score ≤3 predicts better event-free survival, while higher scores identify patients with very poor outcomes who may need alternative strategies.
  • A prospective trial reported ¹²³I-MIBG sensitivity 88–93% and specificity 83–92%, with false negatives mainly in minimal residual disease.
  • ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET can show more disease than ¹²³I-MIBG in high-risk neuroblastoma (bone involvement in 97% vs 81% of patients in one series comparing PET with planar MIBG), and the two tracers give complementary information.
  • ¹⁸F-FDG PET helps when MIBG is negative or discordant: in one selected series, sensitivity was 78% for FDG versus 50% for ¹²³I-MIBG, and 85% when combined.
  • ¹³¹I-MIBG therapy (β⁻ and γ emitter, half-life 8 days) is established for relapsed or refractory high-risk neuroblastoma and is being tested in front-line therapy; about 12 mCi/kg (444 MBq/kg) is the usual maximum without stem-cell support, and ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE is feasible in relapsed or refractory disease.

Sources: PMID 29938300 (EANM neuroblastoma imaging guideline 2018) · PMID 28887399 · PMID 28940046 · PMID 28887399 (Yanik 2018) · PMID 28940046 (Ladenstein 2018) · PMID 19185008 (Vik 2009) · PMID 32796449 (Gains 2020) · PMID 21617976 (Melzer 2011)

Practise with a case

Spotted an error or something out of date? Report an error